Re: DIGITAL CS433 Laptop
From: Jack Peacock (peacock_at_simconv.com)
Date: 06/14/04
- Previous message: Ben Myers: "Re: DIGITAL CS433 Laptop"
- In reply to: Ben Myers: "Re: DIGITAL CS433 Laptop"
- Next in thread: Ben Myers: "Re: DIGITAL CS433 Laptop"
- Reply: Ben Myers: "Re: DIGITAL CS433 Laptop"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 15:38:04 -0700
<ben_myers_spam_me_not @ charter.net (Ben Myers)> wrote in message
news:40ccc2b0.1906396@news.charter.net...
> The very first computers with a BIOS autodetect feature, 386 clones, had a
> limitation of 528MB, because that's all that was available at the time,
and the
> BIOS designers and writers were either very dim-witted or short-sighted,
> possibly both.
>
Actually the BIOS writers were keeping to the IDE standards of the time.
The breaks at 512M/2G/8G/128G have to do with the number of bits available
in hardware to address sectors as the IDE spec evolved. Early SCSI
interfaces had the same problem at 1GB, and old MFM/RLL controllers at
128MB.
Jack Pea***
- Previous message: Ben Myers: "Re: DIGITAL CS433 Laptop"
- In reply to: Ben Myers: "Re: DIGITAL CS433 Laptop"
- Next in thread: Ben Myers: "Re: DIGITAL CS433 Laptop"
- Reply: Ben Myers: "Re: DIGITAL CS433 Laptop"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]