Re: PWS333i+ upgrades
From: Rich Jordan (jordan_at_ccs4vms.com)
Date: 07/31/04
- Previous message: Rich Jordan: "Re: PWS333i+ upgrades"
- Maybe in reply to: Rich Jordan: "Re: PWS333i+ upgrades"
- Next in thread: Ben Myers: "Re: PWS333i+ upgrades"
- Reply: Ben Myers: "Re: PWS333i+ upgrades"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 31 Jul 2004 11:54:37 -0700
ben_myers_spam_me_not @ charter.net (Ben Myers) wrote in message news:<4108809e.33155786@news.charter.net>...
> Rich,
>
> Unless the motherboard BIOS chokes when it sees a Celeron processor, one of them
> ought to work. Supposedly, Intel never did anything to certify dual-processor
> Celerons, but there have been reports of dual Celery systems running. The
> reality is that the Celeron is not much different than a Pentium II in terms of
> hardware architecture... Ben Myers
>
Oh well, no free upgrades after all. Tried all permutations of CPU,
slotket, single/dual setup (with terminator when single), auto versus
fixed bus speed, plus a variety of multiplier settings (which seem to
be ignored). The bios always reports the system is (line breaks are
what displayed):
Digital Personal Workstation 366
i LX V1.05
blah blah
CPU=Pentium Pro 366
MHz SP
It never recognized the second processor (always showed the 'SP'), and
would always hang immediately after the memory test; sometimes video
would go away, but more often it would just stop with the static
display. There were coolers on the CPUs so they were not overheating.
Given this result, I think its safe to assume the problem is in the
bios or system not recognizing the new CPUs, so there's no point in
trying different slotket hardware (which a friend has offered). I
guess Compaq never bothered upgrading the bios on these even though
the last release still had known problems to be fixed, unless they had
a service fix that was never publically released (and I know Celeron
compatibility would only be a side effect if they had). The most
recent version (1.05) does list one Celeron in the release notes, but
the ones I have are not recognized. Guess this poor thing will never
be more than a poor 333MHz DP linux toy. Thanks for your response
nonetheless.
Rich
- Previous message: Rich Jordan: "Re: PWS333i+ upgrades"
- Maybe in reply to: Rich Jordan: "Re: PWS333i+ upgrades"
- Next in thread: Ben Myers: "Re: PWS333i+ upgrades"
- Reply: Ben Myers: "Re: PWS333i+ upgrades"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|