Re: 11/40 misbehaviour
From: RHB (dcs8506_at_bellsouth.net)
Date: 08/11/04
- Previous message: Rich Alderson: "Re: 11/40 misbehaviour"
- In reply to: Rich Alderson: "Re: 11/40 misbehaviour"
- Next in thread: Rich Alderson: "Re: 11/40 misbehaviour"
- Reply: Rich Alderson: "Re: 11/40 misbehaviour"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 11 Aug 2004 12:39:04 -0700
Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> wrote in message news:<mddhdramrlu.fsf@panix5.panix.com>...
> John Santos <JOHN@egh.com> writes:
>
> > Are you sure it is a PSW bit 4 (T bit, indicates trace trap), and not a
> > trap through the vector at 4? <snip>
>
> Yes, I was quite sure. I was, however, confusing two occurrences. Error code
> TBT is "T-bit trap"--and I did get it on the other box, quite often.
>
> > Trap through 4 could be anything... T4 is Timeout and other errors,
> > according to my PDP 11/40 Processor Handbook. A Unibus timeout could
> > be caused by incorrect device configuration, but I think the device
> > setup code at boot time should try to protect you against this. (It
> > does on RSTS, by disabling non-existent devices, but I'm not nearly
> > as familiar with RSX.) Memory could be going out to lunch, and failing
> > to respond to reads or writes. Or the bus cable(s), jumper(s) or
> > terminators could be bad, and randomly changing an address bit causing
> > a memory or device address to be wrong.
>
> Error code T04 is precisely this, bus timeouts or odd-address word references.
>
> > Have you tried all the standard things, i.e. reseating boards, checking
> > PS voltages, etc.?
>
> Yes.
>
> > If that doesn't help, try paring down the system to the minimal
> > working configuration (CPU, console terminal, enough memory to run,
> > and the system disk) and then add things back one at a time until
> > the problem recurs.
>
> This is a minimal system: 28KW memory, console, RH11, RX01.
>
> > I haven't seen PDP-11/40 diags in years. We used to have a tape
> > (9-track, 800 bpi) of them, but it is long gone.
>
> Just on general principles, and not my own need, that's too bad.
Do you have a scope to look at levels on the unibus ?
Does the system run but die intermittently or is it flat out dead ?
- Previous message: Rich Alderson: "Re: 11/40 misbehaviour"
- In reply to: Rich Alderson: "Re: 11/40 misbehaviour"
- Next in thread: Rich Alderson: "Re: 11/40 misbehaviour"
- Reply: Rich Alderson: "Re: 11/40 misbehaviour"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|