Re: OpenVMS vs. Tru64?
- From: Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 08:49:08 +0200
On 2008-09-20 01:40, "Michael Kraemer" wrote:
H Vlems schrieb:
Michael, your reasoning is quite sound, but really depends on
experience.
Installing VMS is dead simple, can do it in my sleep and installing
licenses
is no trouble at all because the Montagar licenses install themselves
since they come
in the form of a DCL script.
Yes, but to get it onto the machine, you need sth like ftp.
Which is secured by a PAK, at least until version 7.x.
Kind of a hen-and-egg situation.
Not really ...
Establish a PuTTY terminal session from a PC to the console port, invoke
an editor, and cut'n'paste Montagar's license procedure into the
editor's window. (At least for the base and UCX/TCP-IP-Services licenses.)
[...]
Michael
--
Real names enhance the probability of getting real answers.
My e-mail account at DECUS Munich is no longer valid.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OpenVMS vs. Tru64?
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: OpenVMS vs. Tru64?
- References:
- OpenVMS vs. Tru64?
- From: AndersonBill
- Re: OpenVMS vs. Tru64?
- From: H Vlems
- Re: OpenVMS vs. Tru64?
- From: Michael Kraemer
- Re: OpenVMS vs. Tru64?
- From: H Vlems
- Re: OpenVMS vs. Tru64?
- From: Michael Kraemer
- OpenVMS vs. Tru64?
- Prev by Date: Re: OpenVMS vs. Tru64?
- Next by Date: Re: OpenVMS vs. Tru64?
- Previous by thread: Re: OpenVMS vs. Tru64?
- Next by thread: Re: OpenVMS vs. Tru64?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading