Re: strange limit on shmmax on HP 32 bit
From: Roman Guoussev-Donskoi (rguoussevdonskoi_at_metasolv.com)
Date: 07/25/03
- Previous message: Dennis Handly: "Re: Help! - Constructor related with a static instance of a C++ class will be ignored during run on HPUX"
- In reply to: Juan Paradinas Saenz de Viteri: "Re: strange limit on shmmax on HP 32 bit"
- Next in thread: Robert Klute: "Re: strange limit on shmmax on HP 32 bit"
- Reply: Robert Klute: "Re: strange limit on shmmax on HP 32 bit"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 25 Jul 2003 07:56:41 -0700
Please note the the in HPUX11i documentation on docs.hp.com as well as
in my message specified restriction comes to 64M. They lost one zero
when published it.
HPUX shmmax:
0x40000000 (11.0 docs.hp.com)
0X4000000 (11.11 docs.hp.com)
Nothing to do with 1G quadrants.
Juan Paradinas Saenz de Viteri <n00990a@alcatel.es> wrote in message news:<3F1D1AB0.3052E8BF@alcatel.es>...
> In a 32 bit OS a proccess can address up to 4 GB of memory. This space
> address is splited in 4 scapes of 1 GB each: first for text, second for
> data, and third and forth for shared memory and memory mapped files.
> That's the reason.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Roman Guoussev-Donskoi wrote:
>
> > Does anybody know why HP set maximum on shmmax to 0X4000000=67108864
> > on 32 bit kernel? Does it not look extremely low even for 32 bit OS?
- Previous message: Dennis Handly: "Re: Help! - Constructor related with a static instance of a C++ class will be ignored during run on HPUX"
- In reply to: Juan Paradinas Saenz de Viteri: "Re: strange limit on shmmax on HP 32 bit"
- Next in thread: Robert Klute: "Re: strange limit on shmmax on HP 32 bit"
- Reply: Robert Klute: "Re: strange limit on shmmax on HP 32 bit"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]