Re: Free UNIX for non-commerical use.

From: Jay Maynard (jmaynard_at_thebrain.conmicro.cx)
Date: 07/30/03

  • Next message: Elton Seng Yan Thung: "Re: HPUX Printing to Windows Spooler" 
    Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:14:50 GMT

    On 29 Jul 2003 23:00:39 GMT, Joerg Schilling <js@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
    >In article <slrnbicrn6.cbl.jmaynard@thebrain.conmicro.cx>,
    >Jay Maynard <jmaynard@conmicro.cx> wrote:
    >>On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:28:54 +0200, Uli Link
    >><Ulrich--nO---sPAM--Link@Epost.de> wrote:
    >>>Don't agree: the optimization of the GCC has become much better:
    >>>in 9 out of 10 times the GCC produces faster binaries than vendor compilers
    >>gcc only does well with the current Linux flavor-of-the-week favorite
    >>processor. Its Alpha code generator sucks rocks.
    >Not true for Sun's compiler (sparc _and_ x86) and also not true for the SCO
    >Intel C-compiler.

    Were you referring to my comment (in >>) or the comment I was replying to
    (in >>>)? I'm more or less agreeing with you.

    >What compilers are you talking about? Or do you just wrote somtehing like:

    gcc for Intel does pretty well because it's the major focus of development
    effort, largely due to the popularity of Linux. gcc's other code generators
    have not had the same attention paid to them. The gcc code generator for the
    Alpha is notably rotten.

  • Next message: Elton Seng Yan Thung: "Re: HPUX Printing to Windows Spooler"

    Relevant Pages