Re: +DAportable and interoperability
From: Rémy (remy.bertrand_at_cgeyt.com)
Date: 10/28/03
- Next message: Ian Diddams: "Re: rsh & hp-ux oddities"
- Previous message: laptop0417: "Non Quantum disk on a c3000 workstation"
- In reply to: Rick Jones: "Re: +DAportable and interoperability"
- Next in thread: Rick Jones: "Re: +DAportable and interoperability"
- Reply: Rick Jones: "Re: +DAportable and interoperability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:41:17 +0100
"Rick Jones" <foo@bar.baz.invalid> a écrit dans le message de
news:sYenb.7848$m63.3833@news.cpqcorp.net...
> wenmang <wenmang@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > When I am reading HP doc, I have question regarding to the statement
> > "aCC +DAportable prog.C (compatible across 1.1 and 2.0 workstations
> > and servers)".
> > Using +DAportable compiler option, does it solve the
> > "interoperability" between 32-bit and 64-bit?
>
> In that it causes a 32-bit binary to be produced, and 32-bit
> application binaries can be run by both 32-bit and 64-bit kernels,
> yes, it solves that as well.
>
> rick jones
Except that interoperability problems are still here between "+DAportable"
applications and other 64 bits applications (on 64 bits kernels).
So your applications will be interoperable but not with *all* existing
applications.
Rémy
- Next message: Ian Diddams: "Re: rsh & hp-ux oddities"
- Previous message: laptop0417: "Non Quantum disk on a c3000 workstation"
- In reply to: Rick Jones: "Re: +DAportable and interoperability"
- Next in thread: Rick Jones: "Re: +DAportable and interoperability"
- Reply: Rick Jones: "Re: +DAportable and interoperability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|