Re: future of hp pa-risc processors?
From: Pavel Pokorny (Pavel.Pokorny_at_vscht.RemoveMe.MeToo.cz)
Date: 07/21/05
- Previous message: Ultra Kiasu: "Removal of PWHIST files?"
- In reply to: Goetz Hoffart: "Re: future of hp pa-risc processors?"
- Next in thread: Eric Stahl: "Re: future of hp pa-risc processors?"
- Reply: Eric Stahl: "Re: future of hp pa-risc processors?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:09:13 +0000 (UTC)
Goetz Hoffart <usenet@hoffart.de> wrote:
> Marcin 'Rambo' Roguski <m_roguski@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Yeah, yeah, we heard that about 8800 too... I still believe that, since people
> > abandon interest in Itanium (hey, even IBM and SGI!), that may be a good
> > sign...
> A good sign for what? They won't move to PA-RISC. IBM will stick on its
> POWER5 (and they do well) or use Xeon, Opteron and maybe Itanium.
> PA-RISC has no future since further development is stalled. The last
> chip releases were slightly improves over older designs but nothing
> really new.
Do HP people read this newsgroup?
Could someone of them spend an informal advice here?
I am not interested in a platform used by the majority
of the planet. This will be the first target of software terrorists.
I want a machine that computes my equations and is reliable enough.
-- Pavel Pokorny Math Dept, Prague Institute of Chemical Technology http://www.vscht.cz/mat/Pavel.Pokorny
- Previous message: Ultra Kiasu: "Removal of PWHIST files?"
- In reply to: Goetz Hoffart: "Re: future of hp pa-risc processors?"
- Next in thread: Eric Stahl: "Re: future of hp pa-risc processors?"
- Reply: Eric Stahl: "Re: future of hp pa-risc processors?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|