Re: long hostname question
- From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 00:33:48 GMT
albemuth <manunderstress@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Have an 8400 that has a hostname of more that is 9 chars. In 11i at
least, this is a no-no, but that's besided the point, as the box is in
production and i have to "deal with it."
11i which? 1.0 or 2.0?
Haven't noticed too many difficulties execpt I have the oracle folks
complaining that 'uname -n' gives the truncated hostname. I have told
them to use 'hostname' but it's some script they have the same on all
boxes. So, anyway to get uname -n to report the hostname?
I suspect not. And while I cannot really defend the current
limitations on the name returned by uname -n and anxiously await its
enhancement IMO, if the intent is to do things with TCP/IP networking
it is a _bug_ to use uname -n instead of hostname. The names are from
different "namespaces."
rick jones
--
denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance, rebirth...
where do you want to be today?
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
.
- References:
- long hostname question
- From: albemuth
- long hostname question
- Prev by Date: Re: Many TCP/IP packages with incorrect checksums
- Next by Date: Re: Many TCP/IP packages with incorrect checksums
- Previous by thread: Re: long hostname question
- Next by thread: Re: wdb crashes (only my DISPLAY)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|