Q: Data Protector FILESYSTEM vs. -trees
- From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:24:25 +0100
Hi,
I have a question on Data Protector backup:
When "clicking together" a backup specification, the datalist usually contains
one FILESYSTEM object per filesystem, making one "data protector object".
You could also specify multiple "-trees" options withing such a FILESYSTEM
object it seems, thereby making one data protector object from multiple
filesystems (In the GUI it would be possible from the
"Backup summary->Properties").
Assuming that's really possible, are there advantages/disadvantages other than
object scheduling? It would be tempting when having /usr/, /opt, /var, etc on
one disk to also put these filesystems into one data Protector object. That
way I could specify a "concurrency" while still avoiding useless paralellism
(like backing up /var and /usr in parallel) that will only slow down the
system.
Regards,
Ulrich
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Mount points with the same name?
- Next by Date: sendmail not receiving from outside
- Previous by thread: Mount points with the same name?
- Next by thread: sendmail not receiving from outside
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|