Re: WANTED BIG SCSI DRIVES- route of problem Re: cpio screw up
From: Khalid Schofield (oums0246_at_crow.linux.ox.ac.uk)
Date: 11/09/03
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: vswap- general discussion"
- Previous message: Spidy: "Re: vswap- general discussion"
- In reply to: Benjamin Goldsteen: "Re: WANTED BIG SCSI DRIVES- route of problem Re: cpio screw up"
- Next in thread: Paul: "Re: WANTED BIG SCSI DRIVES- route of problem Re: cpio screw up"
- Reply: Paul: "Re: WANTED BIG SCSI DRIVES- route of problem Re: cpio screw up"
- Reply: Benjamin Goldsteen: "Re: WANTED BIG SCSI DRIVES- route of problem Re: cpio screw up"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 19:53:21 +0000 To: Benjamin Goldsteen <ben@inka.mssm.edu>
Hi,
well my server has been going just over a year. Chugging away with it's
1Tb raid. I've used ide drived at home in my server. Very sad experience.
Had 2 drives fail..... The ole server at work hasn't been going long but
we did have a 10 year old hp running with maxtor drives if I remember
rightly in a raid0 config removed from service this year :-). Just how are
the scsi drives different in construction to ide drives? Why are they so
much better?
*********************
Khalid Schofield
System Administrator / EM Technician
Dept. Of Materials
University Of Oxford
Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3PH
Email: khalid.schofield@materials.ox.ac.uk
Tel: 01865 273785
Fax: 01865 283333
Web: http://www-em.materials.ox.ac.uk/people/schofield/index.html
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Benjamin Goldsteen wrote:
> Khalid Schofield <oums0246@raven.linux.ox.ac.uk> wrote in message news:<Pine.LNX.4.58.0311081828380.21125@raven.linux.ox.ac.uk>...
> > I've never had a prob with maxtor drives in the last 5 years ;-) IBM's
> > have given me a few probs. I agree that seagate were the number one disk
>
> Were these the IDE/ATA Maxtor drives or the SCSI Maxtor drives?
>
> These days, the mechanism used in IDE/ATA disks and SCSI disks are
> quite a bit different. Also, IDE/ATA disks tend to be used in
> situtations that are less demanding than SCSI. As such as line of
> IDE/ATA disks may appear reliable for one person (who for example only
> uses it in desktop computers) while it may fail horribly for someone
> else (who for example tried to use it in a server setting). In
> theory, its just an interface but in practice those $150 IDE/ATA
> drives are quite a bit different than the $800 SCSI/FC disks.
>
> > giant but not too use now. One of the prof's in our Dept in the uni is
> > doing work for seagate on disk technology. Hay they must be great ;-)
> > Seriously though I think maxtor scsi drives are fine. I'm using 14 of them
> > in a raid config on my unix server I run at the Uni. Not a prob so far
> > touch wood.
>
> Just curious, how long have you been using the Maxtor SCSI drives in
> this RAID? What kind of load it is under?
>
> I never had a compatability problem with the Quantum SCSI drives.
> Just reliability. The only compatability problem I can recall having
> with a SCSI drives was an IBM in a Power Challenge XL. The
> Fast/Wide/SE 36GB (if I remember) IBM worked everywhere but that
> machine. The Seagate just worked everywhere.
>
> > > How good are Maxtor's SCSI drives? In the past, I've always had the
> > > best experience with the Seagate. The worst with Quantum. I don't
> > > fret if a Dell comes with a Fujistu, but I always felt the Seagate
> > > drives were worth the premium for "serious UNIX systems".
>
- Next message: Walter Roberson: "Re: vswap- general discussion"
- Previous message: Spidy: "Re: vswap- general discussion"
- In reply to: Benjamin Goldsteen: "Re: WANTED BIG SCSI DRIVES- route of problem Re: cpio screw up"
- Next in thread: Paul: "Re: WANTED BIG SCSI DRIVES- route of problem Re: cpio screw up"
- Reply: Paul: "Re: WANTED BIG SCSI DRIVES- route of problem Re: cpio screw up"
- Reply: Benjamin Goldsteen: "Re: WANTED BIG SCSI DRIVES- route of problem Re: cpio screw up"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|