Re: Another one bites the dust
From: Per Ekman (pek_at_pdc.kth.se)
Date: 08/22/04
- Previous message: Per Ekman: "Re: the REAL Project Ultraviolet thread"
- In reply to: Ian Mapleson: "Re: Another one bites the dust"
- Next in thread: SkyWriter: "Re: Another one bites the dust"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 22 Aug 2004 12:43:55 +0200
mapesdhs@yahoo.com (Ian Mapleson) writes:
> "Benjamin Gawert" <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote:
> > MIPS and SPARC have no light against Itanium, POWER and x86. ...
>
> Can I have a 2048-CPU Itanium machine then? Opps, sorry, no such thing.
>
> No problem with MIPS. Ask SGI, they'll do you won if you have the dosh.
>
> For scalability, SGI MIPS/IRIX is way ahead of everyone, by an order
> of magnitude comapred to some vendors (single image, etc.)
There's no way the scalability is tied to the MIPS chip (compared with
the Itanium). Given that they share the same system architecture the
scaling is purely a OS issue. Yes, power consumption is an issue if
you add space constraints but otherwise I'm pretty sure an Altix
scales just as well as an O3k hardware-wise.
*p
- Previous message: Per Ekman: "Re: the REAL Project Ultraviolet thread"
- In reply to: Ian Mapleson: "Re: Another one bites the dust"
- Next in thread: SkyWriter: "Re: Another one bites the dust"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|