Re: Intel misses Itanium sales (...SGI moved just over 1,000 boxes...)
mapesdhs_at_yahoo.com
Date: 03/01/05
- Next message: clusardi2k_at_aol.com: "Re: cin >> std::min -->No operator ">>" matches these operands"
- Previous message: arie van schutterhoef: "Intel misses Itanium sales (...SGI moved just over 1,000 boxes...)"
- In reply to: arie van schutterhoef: "Intel misses Itanium sales (...SGI moved just over 1,000 boxes...)"
- Next in thread: John-Paul Stewart: "Re: Intel misses Itanium sales (...SGI moved just over 1,000 boxes...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 1 Mar 2005 03:18:20 -0800
The answer should be obvious for anyone who's kept up with how this
market has developed over the years.
There's no way SGI could have produced its own design at a price
competitive enough to beat Intel's offering of the day. SGI's CPU
would have been faster (around 30% or more I was told) but not
*enough* faster to warrant the higher cost. Add to that the lure
of Intel salaries for the IA64 programme and the inevitable staff
movements which followed, and there you have it.
Some of SGI's ideas are now in the IA64. It's a fast chip, it's scaling
well and SGI is doing good things with it. Whatever one may have
wished had happened, the real world isn't like that. Would you have
been able to turn down $85/hour?
Ian.
SGI Depot: http://www.futuretech.blinkenlights.nl/sgidepot/
Email: mapesdhs@yahoo.com
Backup email (send copy to this too): sgidepot@blueyonder.co.uk
Home: +44 (0)131 476 0796 (best to call this number first)
Mobile: 07743 495403 (usually off; leave a message and I'll call back)
SGI/Future Technology/N64: http://www.futuretech.blinkenlights.nl/
Doom Help Service (DHS): http://www.gamers.org/dhs/
- Next message: clusardi2k_at_aol.com: "Re: cin >> std::min -->No operator ">>" matches these operands"
- Previous message: arie van schutterhoef: "Intel misses Itanium sales (...SGI moved just over 1,000 boxes...)"
- In reply to: arie van schutterhoef: "Intel misses Itanium sales (...SGI moved just over 1,000 boxes...)"
- Next in thread: John-Paul Stewart: "Re: Intel misses Itanium sales (...SGI moved just over 1,000 boxes...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|