Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)
From: Atro Tossavainen (Atro.Tossavainen+news_at_helsinki.finland.invalid)
Date: 03/05/05
- Previous message: arie van schutterhoef: "R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- In reply to: arie van schutterhoef: "R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Next in thread: arie van schutterhoef: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Reply: arie van schutterhoef: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 06 Mar 2005 00:28:30 +0200
arie van schutterhoef <arsche@xs4all.nl> writes:
> I wonder if it's worthwhile to replace a R10000-150mHz with a
> R12000-300mHz in an o2.
> Is the doubling increase reality or just bogus?
Depends on the price, I suppose.
> Just wondering whether audio applications will benefit
> from this.
What exactly are you doing?
-- Atro Tossavainen (Mr.) / The Institute of Biotechnology at Systems Analyst, Techno-Amish & / the University of Helsinki, Finland, +358-9-19158939 UNIX Dinosaur / employs me, but my opinions are my own. < URL : http : / / www . helsinki . fi / %7E atossava / > NO FILE ATTACHMENTS
- Previous message: arie van schutterhoef: "R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- In reply to: arie van schutterhoef: "R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Next in thread: arie van schutterhoef: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Reply: arie van schutterhoef: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|