Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)
From: arie van schutterhoef (arsche_at_xs4all.nl)
Date: 03/06/05
- Previous message: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- In reply to: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Next in thread: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Reply: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 02:00:30 +0100
In article <pgzzmxh7mnl.fsf@kruuna.helsinki.fi>, Atro Tossavainen
<Atro.Tossavainen+news@helsinki.finland.invalid> wrote:
> Depends on the price, I suppose.
-90 euro's (which is affordable, I guess...)
> What exactly are you doing?
-Running PD and doing FFT's for realtime audio performances.
I'm not so sure how benchmarks relate to this, in the
sense of pure number crunching.
Because I found this link regarding PD running on
different platforms:
http://iem.at/mailinglists/pd-list/2003-11/015206.html
I wa quite surprised about the outcome.
I also made me wonder about SGI policy itself, regarding
OS and hardware. But that another topic...
AvS
- Previous message: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- In reply to: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Next in thread: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Reply: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]