Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)
From: arie van schutterhoef (arsche_at_xs4all.nl)
Date: 03/19/05
- Previous message: I R A Darth Aggie: "Re: Exchange 2003 denying email from SGI client."
- In reply to: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Next in thread: Tony 'Nicoya' Mantler: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Reply: Tony 'Nicoya' Mantler: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 17:42:49 +0100
> The overall system design differences between the O2 and the Octane
> may mean that you won't be able to get quite as much out of your O2
> as Olaf does on his Octane with an identical CPU.
-The question is probably more or whether the o2's UMA makes
a difference in comparison to the Octane's switch. In particular
when the system contains two cpu's.
Also secondary cache will influence the outcome.
AvS
- Previous message: I R A Darth Aggie: "Re: Exchange 2003 denying email from SGI client."
- In reply to: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Next in thread: Tony 'Nicoya' Mantler: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Reply: Tony 'Nicoya' Mantler: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]