Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)
From: Tony 'Nicoya' Mantler (nicoya_at_ubb.ca)
Date: 03/20/05
- Previous message: arie van schutterhoef: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- In reply to: arie van schutterhoef: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Next in thread: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Reply: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:34:53 GMT
In article <200320051805445510%arsche@xs4all.nl>,
arie van schutterhoef <arsche@xs4all.nl> wrote:
: > You can read Ian's CPU performance tables for examples showing how the FP
: > performance especially is completely neutered in the R10k O2 compared to
: > the
: > exact same CPU in the Octane or even the Indigo2:
: > <http://www.futuretech.blinkenlights.nl/r10kcomp.html>
: > <http://www.futuretech.blinkenlights.nl/r10k250comp.html>
: -I've read them some time ago and they give a general
: indication, but I'm not so sure to what extent they relate
: to audio processing. They all seem to graphics -oriented.
: Though maybe it's better to speak in general signal processing
: terms.
The benchmarks on those pages use a number of algorithms to test various aspects
of floating point and integer CPU/System performance respectively.
: > If you don't use the UMA features in the O2 then you're *much* better off
: > with an Octane.
: -I presume with UMA's strengths, you talk of the I/O benefits?
: As far as being better of: the o2 is going to be used for
: concerts and an Octane is far too noisy with all these fans.
: The o2 is much quieter, so otherwise the Octane would be the favorite.
UMA's strengths are primarily in the areas of 3d texturing using video as
texture or using jumbo textures. The O2 also has the benefit of having very
cheap and available video IO.
The Octane can be a bit noisy if the ambient temperature is above 25c, otherwise
it's not too bad.
Cheers - Tony 'Nicoya' Mantler :)
-- Tony 'Nicoya' Mantler -- Master of Code-fu -- nicoya@ubb.ca -- http://nicoya.feline.pp.se/ -- http://www.ubb.ca/ --
- Previous message: arie van schutterhoef: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- In reply to: arie van schutterhoef: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Next in thread: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Reply: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|