Re: NEKOCHAN - is it down?
From: Emery Davis (notareal_at_address.com)
Date: 03/21/05
- Previous message: Tristram Scott: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- In reply to: Ivan Rayner: "Re: NEKOCHAN - is it down?"
- Next in thread: Ivan Rayner: "Re: NEKOCHAN - is it down?"
- Reply: Ivan Rayner: "Re: NEKOCHAN - is it down?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:52:54 +0100
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:49:48 +0000 (UTC), Ivan Rayner <ivanr@sgi.com> said:
] Emery Davis <notareal@address.com> wrote:
] > On 20 Mar 2005 03:22:38 GMT, R10000 <nobody@nowhere.com> said:
] >
] > ] i have not been able to get to the site for ages, it pings but there is
] > ] nothing being "served".
] >
] > Got some major downloads on fri, worked just fine.
] >
] > Now if only I could get sylpheed-claws 101 to actually _work_... grrr. :)
]
] I have packaged sylpheed-claws 1.0.3 for IRIX freeware. You can
] download it from:
]
] http://reality.exsgi.org/ivanr/fw_sylpheed-claws.tardist
]
] I've been using this (and 1.0 and 1.0.1) for a little while now.
]
Ivan,
Same problem I had with the nekoware version, although not in exactly the same way.
Refuses to get mail, with message:
harpo 31% ./sylpheed
** WARNING **: sock_connect_address_list_async: connection to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:110 failed
** WARNING **: can't connect to server.
** WARNING **: [11:47:02] Connection failed.
Trace/BPT/RangeErr/DivZero/Ovflow trap (core dumped)
harpo 32%
The dump is on a missing function trap, cvd tells me.
Any ideas?
-E
-- Emery Davis You can reply to emeryamazon@ebayadelka.com by removing the well known companies
- Previous message: Tristram Scott: "Re: R10000-150mHz_vs_R12000-300mHz...(?)"
- In reply to: Ivan Rayner: "Re: NEKOCHAN - is it down?"
- Next in thread: Ivan Rayner: "Re: NEKOCHAN - is it down?"
- Reply: Ivan Rayner: "Re: NEKOCHAN - is it down?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|