Re: /proc filesystem is +3gb, is this normal???
From: Greg Andrews (gerg_at_panix.com)
Date: 09/27/03
- Next message: Scott Howard: "Re: Solaris 2.6 to 8 upgrade rm6 foulup"
- Previous message: Rhugga: "/proc filesystem is +3gb, is this normal???"
- In reply to: Rhugga: "/proc filesystem is +3gb, is this normal???"
- Next in thread: Scott Howard: "Re: /proc filesystem is +3gb, is this normal???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 21:55:19 +0000 (UTC)
Rhugga <ccarson@echeeba.com> writes:
>
>I have an Ultra 10, 1gb mem, running Solaris 9. It is running apache2,
>tomcat, postfix, and mysql.
>
>It is not hit very hard and the total number of processes is not that
>great. I looked in /proc and saw a lot of these entries:
>dr-x--x--x 5 apache httpd 736 Sep 27 09:59 336
>dr-x--x--x 5 apache httpd 736 Sep 27 09:59 337
>dr-x--x--x 5 apache httpd 736 Sep 27 09:59 338
>dr-x--x--x 5 apache httpd 736 Sep 27 09:59 339
>dr-x--x--x 5 apache httpd 736 Sep 27 09:59 340
>dr-x--x--x 5 apache httpd 736 Sep 27 09:59 341
>
/proc is not a real filesystem that consumes disk space.
It's the list of processes on the machine and the information
about them. The /usr/bin/ps command reads from all those
directories and files under /proc in order to display the
list of processes to you.
Another way of saying it is that the /proc "filesystem" is
just a way of viewing the kernel's information about all the
currently running processes.
-Greg
-- Do NOT reply via e-mail. Reply in the newsgroup.
- Next message: Scott Howard: "Re: Solaris 2.6 to 8 upgrade rm6 foulup"
- Previous message: Rhugga: "/proc filesystem is +3gb, is this normal???"
- In reply to: Rhugga: "/proc filesystem is +3gb, is this normal???"
- Next in thread: Scott Howard: "Re: /proc filesystem is +3gb, is this normal???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|