Re: (driver not attached) - on steroids
From: Chris Newport (me_at_see-my-sig.invalid)
Date: 12/29/03
- Next message: Kent Wormsdorf: "Re: SPARC-10: Replacing a SUN IDE-CDROM with a third party IDE-CDROM"
- Previous message: Casper H.S. ***: "Re: (driver not attached) - on steroids"
- In reply to: buckwheat: "(driver not attached) - on steroids"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:11:41 +0000
On Monday 29 December 2003 3:35 pm in comp.sys.sun.admin buckwheat wrote:
> This is from my attempt to load Sol9 on an older Sparc 20. As you can
> see, Sol9 didn't load a good # of drivers. What's the best plan of
> action to resolve all these "unfound" drivers? Should I? Is the
> system even using both processors? Memory? "qe" ethernets? As you
> can see, system is running - would it be worth my while to pursue
> this?
Most of the items listed such as memory do not need any drivers.
If you read the release notes you will see that the qe controller
is no longer supported, you *might* be able to copy the drivers
from Solaris 8, but this cheat might not work.
psrinfo will tell you what processors are running.
-- My real address is crn (at) netunix (dot) com WARNING all messages containing attachments or html will be silently deleted. Send only plain text.
- Next message: Kent Wormsdorf: "Re: SPARC-10: Replacing a SUN IDE-CDROM with a third party IDE-CDROM"
- Previous message: Casper H.S. ***: "Re: (driver not attached) - on steroids"
- In reply to: buckwheat: "(driver not attached) - on steroids"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]