Re: Sunfire 240 and Sun One messaging
From: W.B (civikminded_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/30/03
- Next message: CHANGE USERNAME TO westes: "Looking For Terminal Server That Can Give Each Serial Port a Unique IP"
- Previous message: Markus Strangl: "Re: a little trouble with "cdrw" and audio disks.."
- In reply to:(deleted message) Michael Vilain
: "Re: Sunfire 240 and Sun One messaging" - Next in thread: Michael Vilain
: "Re: Sunfire 240 and Sun One messaging" - Reply:(deleted message) Michael Vilain
: "Re: Sunfire 240 and Sun One messaging" - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:19:00 -0600
Thanks for your response.
>
> Yes, I'm saying that switching from a user-managed POP3/sendmail
> environment where all you need to worry about is the size of your
> /var/mail and /var/spool/mqueue filesystems to an IT-managed environment
> that really can't be automated very well. You'll need to manage user's
> public folders and their abuse of them, their email quota and when they
> go over, and calendaring stuff.
Our current setup uses an amalgum of tricks, hacks, configs to do the
things that an exchange server does like group schedules, free/busy, user
directory, etc.. It has become troublesome maintaing all these weird
configurations, as well as 3 different versions of Outlook, so I want a
client/server combo that does these things naitively. Plus I want to be
able share a single calandar across many users, something I cannot do with
POP/SMTP Outlook.
> Be sure to buy lots of extra disk--users will find all sorts of stuff to
> put on it now that they have more. And don't forget backing all this up
> and writing procedures to restore user mailboxes (which _you_ now manage
> instead of them).
None of the Outlook .PST's are backed up *AT ALL* currently. Wouldnt
having it all centralized actually make the backup job *EASIER*? I have a
decent CA Brightstor setup in place, with a 10 cart loader.
> If Exchange is easier to run and maintain, hold your nose and buy it.
> But my guess is that you'll still have to offer the extended services
> because _you_ will be managing the user's mail (and all those extra
> services) rather than _the user_.
Exchange might be the most viable option as much as I hate to admit it.
> There may be a lot of pressure from users to offer this service but are
> your "Powers That Be" willing to spend the money to support and maintain
> the environment? Or will all this just be added to your current duties?
I would be maintaining whatever we purchase. Much of my workload already
is devoted to messaging, I'm hoping to simplify!
- Next message: CHANGE USERNAME TO westes: "Looking For Terminal Server That Can Give Each Serial Port a Unique IP"
- Previous message: Markus Strangl: "Re: a little trouble with "cdrw" and audio disks.."
- In reply to:(deleted message) Michael Vilain
: "Re: Sunfire 240 and Sun One messaging" - Next in thread: Michael Vilain
: "Re: Sunfire 240 and Sun One messaging" - Reply:(deleted message) Michael Vilain
: "Re: Sunfire 240 and Sun One messaging" - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|