Re: Problems with legato labelling new tapes i

From: Daniel Wetzler (Daniel.Wetzler_at_uni-koeln.de)
Date: 01/29/04

  • Next message: Luca Ferrari: "Re: ls problem on solaris 5.8" 
    Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:17:59 +0100

    Hallo,

    thanks for the answer.
    Unfortunately that's not the solution.
    If the jukebox would label the tapes correctly the error
    messages would't appear at a 2nd run of the labelling.
    But unfortunately they do :-(.

    Do you have another idea what could be the solution of my problem ?

    Greetings,

    Daniel

    Florian Stiassny wrote:
    > In article 1@ID-222334.news.uni-berlin.de, Daniel Wetzler <Daniel.Wetzler@uni-koeln.de> writes:
    >
    >>Hallo,
    >>
    >>I'm trying to use new tapes with legato, working with a SUN Storedge l25.
    >>The l25 is configured as a "Jukebox" and if I do an inventory with all
    >>tapes, it works properly but tells me that none of the tapes are labelled.
    >>If I want to label all the tapes, I get for each tape the error :
    >>
    >>Wed 14:49:47 /dev/rmt/0cbn read open error, I/O error
    >>Wed 14:49:47 nsrjb notice: nsrjb -j l25 -Y -O64 -L -g -bDefault -f
    >>/dev/rmt/0cbn -S 2 bcsunfire01.bc.uni_koeln.de.001
    >>Wed 14:49:48 /dev/rmt/0cbn 1:Verify label operation in progress
    >>
    >>The tapes are read/writeable, because I used them for normal
    >>ufsdump-operations before, which worked properly.
    >>
    >>Does anyone know what's going wrong with my tapes ?
    >>
    >>Greetings,
    >>
    >>Daniel
    >>
    >
    > its an io error because legato try first to read the label, but because tapes are new
    > there is no label. tapes are properly labeled
    >
    > ---
    > \|/
    > o o
    > ___________________oOO_(_)_OOo______________________________________
    > Florian Stiassny Florian.Stiassny@motorola.com
    >
    >

  • Next message: Luca Ferrari: "Re: ls problem on solaris 5.8"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: A very simple yes/no question about LRECL
      ... I've previously read tapes where data is physically written ... I'm not sure how to lose the control character, ... A label is just a block of data after all. ... //SYSPRINT DD DUMMY ...
      (bit.listserv.ibm-main)
    • Re: problems with multi volume, restore using FDR
      ... It was very obvious that this was the first time this had ever ... The tapes are created SL tapes so my thinking was that ... The job is created with Label= ... IMO should be standard label and have a restore JCL using the data set name it was created with. ...
      (bit.listserv.ibm-main)
    • Re: Request for feedback - BACKUP enhancement
      ... > It would be awesome if there was a label generation callback. ... If you are not sure how many tapes your backup will require, ...
      (comp.os.vms)
    • RE: Relabelling a 3592 in an ATL
      ... I went through a similar problem ordering backstore tapes for my VTS. ... answer was that if the label was wrong, or not even there, the VTS software ...
      (bit.listserv.ibm-main)
    • Re: Problems with legato labelling new tapes i
      ... >I'm trying to use new tapes with legato, working with a SUN Storedge l25. ... >tapes, it works properly but tells me that none of the tapes are labelled. ... its an io error because legato try first to read the label, ...
      (comp.sys.sun.admin)