Performance Tuning Oracle DB/Apache CGI
From: Keg (rhugga_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 08/30/04
- Next message: news_at_elaan.dds.nl: "Re: Sending syslog to local files and remote"
- Previous message: Greg Andrews: "Re: Sending syslog to local files and remote"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 30 Aug 2004 13:45:38 -0700
We are using a biotech package that is essentially a collection of CGI
programs ran under apache (2.0.50) that establish TCP connections to
our Oracle database on the same subnet. The network is only at 5%
utilization. The oracle database has a trunked 2gb copper (X1150A's)
network pipe and the apache machine has a 1gb fiber network
connection. The oracle db is tuned and we can't find any bottlenecks
there. The SGA looks perfect as well as disk I/O. The tablespaces this
application uses are all on dedicated raid 0+1 volumes (with
data/index/temp all seperated) Our SAN is hardly sweating at about 10%
utilization. Our HBA's are in 66mhz PCI slots and also don't seem to
be heavily hit.
CPU/memory/disk I/O are hardly tasked on either machines. The apache
machine is a Sun 280 with 2x900 Mhz procs and 8gb RAM (solaris 9
64-bit). It is the only application running on this machine and
everything seems idle when these tasks are running. (The apache
processes and subsequent CGI processes never consume more than 1% cpu
usage) Also note that I also tried running the apache components on an
idle E450 with 4gb memory and 4x400 Mhz procs (Solaris 8 64-bit).
I am now looking at mpstat and really don't know what is acceptable
performance or not. Our oracle box is an E4500 with 10 procs/10 gb
memory (solaris 9 64-bit). Here is an mpstat snapshot during one of
the CGI activites:
db-0204:/u01/app/oracle/product/9.2.0.4/network/admin #mpstat 3 100
CPU minf mjf xcal intr ithr csw icsw migr smtx srw syscl usr sys
wt idl
0 9 0 2349 400 300 175 1 2 17 0 129 3 2
0 95
1 11 0 2052 111 108 179 2 5 18 0 177 6 2
0 91
4 9 0 1682 107 104 178 1 4 15 0 161 4 2
0 94
5 10 0 2139 104 101 188 2 5 18 0 185 7 2
0 90
8 9 0 1829 226 223 154 1 4 20 0 163 4 2
0 94
9 10 0 1677 150 147 175 2 5 18 0 187 7 2
0 91
12 10 0 1626 104 102 178 1 4 15 0 156 4 2
0 94
13 10 0 2012 103 101 182 1 5 18 0 167 6 2
0 92
14 10 0 1556 106 104 179 1 4 16 0 166 4 2
0 94
15 10 0 1970 104 101 184 2 5 18 0 178 7 2
0 91
CPU minf mjf xcal intr ithr csw icsw migr smtx srw syscl usr sys
wt idl
0 0 0 2148 402 300 162 4 16 32 0 142 3 1
0 96
1 0 0 1548 108 101 201 8 20 35 0 143 3 2
0 95
4 0 0 2372 103 101 136 4 18 32 0 143 2 2
0 96
5 0 0 29 105 100 160 5 17 35 0 168 3 0
0 97
8 0 0 2457 116 109 92 7 18 50 0 287 16 2
0 82
9 0 0 8 194 189 179 4 16 27 0 155 2 0
0 97
12 0 0 5581 113 101 82 12 12 19 0 332 32 3
0 65
13 2 0 1980 107 101 243 5 17 31 0 153 3 1
0 97
14 0 0 13 107 102 147 4 17 32 0 285 3 1
0 96
15 0 0 8044 112 100 74 11 10 23 0 418 46 7
0 48
CPU minf mjf xcal intr ithr csw icsw migr smtx srw syscl usr sys
wt idl
0 0 0 3759 414 300 180 18 32 52 0 442 21 2
0 77
1 0 0 702 125 104 366 22 40 90 0 406 6 2
0 93
4 0 0 2849 127 103 253 25 41 68 0 541 19 3
1 77
5 0 0 48 116 101 272 17 46 80 0 428 6 6
0 88
8 0 0 5641 150 125 215 27 42 82 0 674 35 5
0 60
9 0 0 5258 207 191 141 16 25 42 0 392 31 4
0 65
12 0 0 3750 122 104 342 21 43 70 0 416 6 4
0 90
13 0 0 261 119 102 227 18 46 95 0 456 7 1
0 92
14 0 1 1427 126 102 279 27 44 83 0 619 13 1
1 85
15 1 1 1486 123 100 283 24 47 79 0 443 7 2
0 90
CPU minf mjf xcal intr ithr csw icsw migr smtx srw syscl usr sys
wt idl
0 0 0 9076 404 300 105 12 11 37 0 420 41 5
0 54
1 0 0 163 106 102 145 4 20 31 0 151 1 1
0 98
4 0 0 38 105 101 104 5 17 41 0 264 3 0
0 97
5 0 0 9746 112 100 100 10 5 22 0 380 47 12
0 41
8 0 0 40 112 109 178 3 15 32 0 162 3 0
0 97
9 0 0 1875 196 194 227 4 20 72 0 150 1 2
0 97
12 0 0 917 105 104 198 3 18 35 0 162 1 2
0 97
13 0 0 999 106 101 157 4 17 26 0 106 1 1
0 98
14 0 0 2078 109 103 142 6 14 26 0 169 6 1
0 93
15 0 0 57 103 101 168 2 16 35 0 208 2 0
0 98
Does anyone see anything that could be a bottleneck in performance? I
believe their code is the culprit, but they claim a significant
difference in performance on a similiar test environment at their
site. (A sample data import that they say took 4 minuntes on their
testbed took 35 minutes on my systems)
Thanks.
rhugga
- Next message: news_at_elaan.dds.nl: "Re: Sending syslog to local files and remote"
- Previous message: Greg Andrews: "Re: Sending syslog to local files and remote"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|