Re: new entry in /var/adm/messages ?
From: Chris Newport (me_at_see-my-sig.invalid)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: Josh McKee: "Re: new entry in /var/adm/messages ?"
- Previous message: Rodrick Brown: "Re: Solaris 9/10 x86 HCL, ugh, severly lacking?"
- In reply to: Keg: "Re: new entry in /var/adm/messages ?"
- Next in thread: Josh McKee: "Re: new entry in /var/adm/messages ?"
- Reply: Josh McKee: "Re: new entry in /var/adm/messages ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:45:43 +0100
On Friday 29 October 2004 4:19 am in comp.sys.sun.admin Keg wrote:
> I have been getting a lot of memory errors on some
> older E450's and E4500's over the past year and I normally wait until
> I start getting several in a 24-hour period.
This is more likely due to power supply capacitors drying
out than bad DIMMs.
-- My real address is crn (at) netunix (dot) com WARNING all messages containing attachments or html will be silently deleted. Send only plain text.
- Next message: Josh McKee: "Re: new entry in /var/adm/messages ?"
- Previous message: Rodrick Brown: "Re: Solaris 9/10 x86 HCL, ugh, severly lacking?"
- In reply to: Keg: "Re: new entry in /var/adm/messages ?"
- Next in thread: Josh McKee: "Re: new entry in /var/adm/messages ?"
- Reply: Josh McKee: "Re: new entry in /var/adm/messages ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]