Re: is sol-10-b69 release?

From: Casper H.S. Dik (Casper.Dik_at_Sun.COM)
Date: 11/17/04

  • Next message: Matthias Schulz: "Re: Sun Enterprise 3500 server boot/video issue" 
    Date: 17 Nov 2004 11:57:15 GMT

    Bernd Markgraf <markgraf@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de> writes:

    >Casper H.S. *** <Casper.***@Sun.COM> writes:

    >> >I've seen some things mentioned as fixed in b73. Are we to assume that
    >does this include the failed assertion upon creating a metadb?
    >where would i look for a list of things which have been fixed?

    Bug ID?

    This one
    5062712 metadb core dumps with assertion partno < dnp->vtoc.nparts in meta_nameinfo.c

    It is listed as fixed in 10_70

    >> No clue; s10_69 is the current one and we're about to
    >> release s10_72 internally; (running s10_71 now).

    >i'm not sure if this has been asked before, but when will
    >zfs be in a beta release, i've heard some rumors that it
    >was in b68 (sun internal) - do you add this seperately for
    >internal releases?

    No, there are separate SUNWzfs packages in internal and limited
    external beta; it is not yet available as part of Solaris Express.

    Casper 

    -- 
Expressed in this posting are my opinions.  They are in no way related
to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.
Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
be fiction rather than truth.
  • Next message: Matthias Schulz: "Re: Sun Enterprise 3500 server boot/video issue"
    • Quantcast