Re: 3rd party memory
From: Axel Neumann (Axel.Neumann_at_epost.de)
Date: 11/23/04
- Previous message: u n d e r a c h i e v e r: "Re: 3rd party memory"
- In reply to: Stig Bull: "3rd party memory"
- Next in thread: Rich Teer: "Re: 3rd party memory"
- Reply: Rich Teer: "Re: 3rd party memory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:07:46 +0100
"Stig Bull" <stig.bull.no.spam@broadpark.no> wrote:
> We have purchased Crucial memory for a couple of V210's, and these works
> quite well.
> However a Sun reseller wants to sell us Sun memory instead (naturally),
> and says that Sun recommends memory with CL=2 while the Crucial memory
> has a CAS latency of 2.5.
> According to our reseller this will void about any guarantee in
> existence since the dawn of mankind, but if we look at the facts rather
> than what a salesperson say, will using Crucial memory have any negative
> impact at all on Sun servers?
>
> --
> Stig Bull
> | remove .no.spam from my email address to reply by mail |
> No animals were hurt or killed in the process of creating this
> electronic message. To reduce download time, this message is made of
> 100% recycled bytes.
Hi,
AFAIK installing TP memory in a Sun will not void the warranty. If the TP
memory will cause any problem Sun will fix it on a time & material base even
if you have a valid maintenance contract.
HTH,
Axel Neumann
- Previous message: u n d e r a c h i e v e r: "Re: 3rd party memory"
- In reply to: Stig Bull: "3rd party memory"
- Next in thread: Rich Teer: "Re: 3rd party memory"
- Reply: Rich Teer: "Re: 3rd party memory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
