Re: scsi failure: bus or disk?
From: Chris Newport (me_at_see-my-sig.invalid)
Date: 12/28/03
- Previous message: Carl Lucas: "Java Desktop System"
- In reply to: Paul Douglas: "Re: scsi failure: bus or disk?"
- Next in thread: Paul Douglas: "Re: scsi failure: bus or disk?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:12:37 +0000
On Sunday 28 December 2003 6:44 am in comp.sys.sun.hardware Paul Douglas
wrote:
> thanks but I have already tried that (and both disks are locked into
> the internal drive cage anyway, so there's no loose wiring involved).
Sounds like it might be a known E450 problem.
The disks plug into backplanes which can flex, leaving the disks
only partially connected. The backplane mounting arrangement has
been modified several times to fix this, early models are the
worst.
Shut down and remove the RH side cover.
Unlatch all disks and slide out a few inches.
For each disk in the central stack, support the rear of the
backplane with your hand and insert the disk whilst watching
through the side of the cage to ensure that the connector seats fully.
Some fiddling and/or moderate force on the rear of the backplane
may be needed to make sure that everything aligns correctly.
Repeat for the outer stack.
-- My real address is crn (at) netunix (dot) com WARNING all messages containing attachments or html will be silently deleted. Send only plain text.
- Previous message: Carl Lucas: "Java Desktop System"
- In reply to: Paul Douglas: "Re: scsi failure: bus or disk?"
- Next in thread: Paul Douglas: "Re: scsi failure: bus or disk?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|