Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun
From: Dennis Grevenstein (dennis_at_pcde.inka.de)
Date: 03/26/04
- Next message: Erik Magnuson: "Re: Blade1500 and Solaris 9..when?"
- Previous message: Dennis Grevenstein: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- In reply to: Rob Ramsey: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- Next in thread: Derek Konigsberg: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 26 Mar 2004 04:50:21 GMT
In comp.sys.sgi.hardware Rob Ramsey <ramseyrt@pcisys.net> wrote:
> I posted this in comp.sys.sgi.misc about a month ago. I still haven't been
> able to get Quake 1 to run on my Sgi machines but if you can get your Sparc
> to run Quake 2, below are some benchmarks. I'll try to bench Quake 2 on
> some Indigo's today (XL, Max Impact), they match your Sparc more closely
> than the equpment below.
Getting the binaries for Solaris was difficult, but I think
I have the demo version of Q2 now. I'll try in a few days.
On the other hand the machines you list are much more
powerful than this old Ultra2.
The U2 has two 200MHz CPU. The 200MHz UltraSPARC I is
comparable to a 195MHz R10K, a bit slower for int,
but a bit stronger for fp.
mfg
Dennis
-- "Wenn ich nur das Eine will, dann waere es cool ich faende Eine, die auch nur das Eine kann, doch vieleicht hast Du ja Character, Persoenlichkeit, nen IQ ueberm Durchschnitt. Tut mir auch leid, dass mir das Wurscht ist." Blumentopf
- Next message: Erik Magnuson: "Re: Blade1500 and Solaris 9..when?"
- Previous message: Dennis Grevenstein: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- In reply to: Rob Ramsey: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- Next in thread: Derek Konigsberg: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]