Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun
From: joe smith (john.smith_at_iiuaudhahsyasdy232462643264276asdhfvhdsafhasdgdsagyufasgyufdashufdas)
Date: 03/29/04
- Next message: SkyWriter: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- Previous message: joe smith: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- In reply to: Alexis Cousein: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- Next in thread: Benjamin Gawert: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- Reply: Benjamin Gawert: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:57:54 +0300
> Well, who'd want to play Quake1 when you have a perfectly good Quake2?
Who'd want to *play* Quake to begin with. Massively boring games and the
graphics engines never been that impressive either. :/(
- Next message: SkyWriter: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- Previous message: joe smith: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- In reply to: Alexis Cousein: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- Next in thread: Benjamin Gawert: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- Reply: Benjamin Gawert: "Re: Quake performance SGI vs Sun"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|