Re: B1600 Chassis network question
From: Fredrik Lundholm (dol_at_ce.chalmers.se)
Date: 10/22/04
- Previous message: Rich Teer: "Re: chip multithreading on ultrasparc iv"
- In reply to: Steph: "Re: B1600 Chassis network question"
- Next in thread: Scott Howard: "Re: B1600 Chassis network question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 22 Oct 2004 19:36:16 GMT
In article <pan.2004.10.22.10.11.08.872708@lineone.ten>,
Steph <stephanos@lineone.ten> wrote:
>What I need
>to know is whether or not I can have a switch set up with VLANs of two IP
>networks, and the other switch monitoring it and doing some sort of
>availability checking (e.g. heartbeat, or something) and 'takes over' the
>connections if the first one fails. As you say each blade is connected to
>each switch on each of it's interfaces, I suspect this isn't possible...
Well, using a dual star toplogy with the blade server and IPMP
in Solaris I think it is possible. (And nothing prevents the two
switches to be cabled up together)
>Which does lead me onto another question -- the B200X blades have 4 ports
>IIRC; what do they plug into?
Aha interesting, never bothered with the B200x, but with four ports
they would connect two of them to each switch.
>Again, I'm new to the whole tech so please excuse my ignorance.
No problemo..
Fredrik
-- Fredrik Lundholm dol @ ce.chalmers.se
- Previous message: Rich Teer: "Re: chip multithreading on ultrasparc iv"
- In reply to: Steph: "Re: B1600 Chassis network question"
- Next in thread: Scott Howard: "Re: B1600 Chassis network question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
