Re: What's the slowest SPARC box that can saturate a gigabit link?
From: Steven Hill (news_at_waroffice.net)
Date: 12/23/04
- Previous message: Jorgen Moquist: "Re: What's the slowest SPARC box that can saturate a gigabit link?"
- In reply to: Jorgen Moquist: "Re: What's the slowest SPARC box that can saturate a gigabit link?"
- Next in thread: Rich Teer: "Re: What's the slowest SPARC box that can saturate a gigabit link?"
- Reply: Rich Teer: "Re: What's the slowest SPARC box that can saturate a gigabit link?"
- Reply: Jorgen Moquist: "Re: What's the slowest SPARC box that can saturate a gigabit link?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:50:05 +0000
> read somewhere at docs.sun.com that 100mbit network requires 110MHz cpu.
> so 1000mbit would use 1100Mhz cpu. ( and i think backplane to ! )
> can the pci on a on U5 really transport that amount of data ?
I can tell you that's nonsense, although I cannot tell you what will drive
a ge adapter... We ran one in a dual 400MHz E250, and a couple of other
machines. I would expect it to work fine on other lower spec hardware too
though.
--
Steven Hill
"If they threw a little Dell server on your desk, you'd be about as close to
delivering a reliable, scalable, usable Web service as if I threw a piston ring
on your table and said drive to Chicago"
- Scott McNealy
- Previous message: Jorgen Moquist: "Re: What's the slowest SPARC box that can saturate a gigabit link?"
- In reply to: Jorgen Moquist: "Re: What's the slowest SPARC box that can saturate a gigabit link?"
- Next in thread: Rich Teer: "Re: What's the slowest SPARC box that can saturate a gigabit link?"
- Reply: Rich Teer: "Re: What's the slowest SPARC box that can saturate a gigabit link?"
- Reply: Jorgen Moquist: "Re: What's the slowest SPARC box that can saturate a gigabit link?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]