Re: Sun Blade 1000 Opinions on Performance
From: Martin Bochnig (mbeinsx_at_cs.tu-berlin.de)
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 04:56:58 +0200
"Casper H.S. Dik" wrote:
> Andrew Tyson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >Casper H.S. Dik wrote:
> >> I don't think that that will actually work. (It's certainly not a supported
> >> or tested configuration)
> >... not supported, but as we all know what Sun supports, and what works
> >are two different things :-) Apart from the minor cosmetic differences
> >the SB1k and SB2k are identical AFAIK (notwithstanding the OBP/POST
> >upgrade I alluded to in teh earlier post).
> There are more differences than that; the motherboards
> aren't exactly the same. (Yes, the PROMs are but I can't
> guarantee the rest of the changes are not relevant to
> supporting the 1.2GHz CPUs.)
I'm a bit disappointed from you: Shouldn't at least YOU know better than
Why do you repeat nonsens / marketing lies ??
Fortunately the SystemHandbook doesn't only contain falsified / FUD
entries in that matter, but somewhat hidden it also contains the truth
regarding sb1k vs. sb2k vs. sf280r vs. n20 .
> Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related
> to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.
> Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
> be fiction rather than truth.