Re: ultra 10 or ultra enterprise II?

From: CJT (abujlehc_at_prodigy.net)
Date: 09/28/05 

Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:26:52 GMT

Nic wrote:

> I've bought a second hand ultra enterprise II (256 MB, 1 processor
> installed). It has some problem at hard disk and the vendor can change it,
> no problem. Now he's proposing me to change this machine with an ultra 10
> (330 MHz, 512 MB Ram). I know the vendor is very honest guy, so I think the
> machine is proposing me is good, but for me is very hard to choice.
> Is the ultra enterprise II more difficult to find or what? Because I'm
> seeing the ultra 10 looks like a machine more powerful.
>
> Many thanks for any suggest,
> Nicola.
>
>
The Ultra 10 won't take a second processor, is PCI rather than S-bus
based, and uses IDE disks rather than SCSI. How you value the two
probably depends a lot on how you feel about S-bus.

BTW, as I recall the 330 MHz processor is the bottom of the line. 

-- 
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam.  Our true address is of the form che...@prodigy.net.
Quantcast