Re: ultra 10 or ultra enterprise II?
From: Dragan Cvetkovic (me_at_privacy.net)
Date: 09/28/05
- Next message: BN: "Re: SCSI FAILURE"
- Previous message: gerryt_at_vcn.bc.ca: "Re: ultra 10 or ultra enterprise II?"
- In reply to: gerryt_at_vcn.bc.ca: "Re: ultra 10 or ultra enterprise II?"
- Next in thread: gerryt_at_vcn.bc.ca: "Re: ultra 10 or ultra enterprise II?"
- Reply: gerryt_at_vcn.bc.ca: "Re: ultra 10 or ultra enterprise II?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:19:53 -0400
gerryt@vcn.bc.ca writes:
> Both machines can run Solaris Express, the Ultra 2 is SCSI based and
> can take up to 2 400 MHz CPUs (with a recent enough motherboard -
> obtainable CHEAP on eBay) vs. a newer generation 440 MHz Ultra 5/10.
Mine Ultra 2 can't as it has 200MHz CPUs, so it very much depend on OP's
CPU speed.
Bye, Dragan
-- Dragan Cvetkovic, To be or not to be is true. G. Boole No it isn't. L. E. J. Brouwer !!! Sender/From address is bogus. Use reply-to one !!!
- Next message: BN: "Re: SCSI FAILURE"
- Previous message: gerryt_at_vcn.bc.ca: "Re: ultra 10 or ultra enterprise II?"
- In reply to: gerryt_at_vcn.bc.ca: "Re: ultra 10 or ultra enterprise II?"
- Next in thread: gerryt_at_vcn.bc.ca: "Re: ultra 10 or ultra enterprise II?"
- Reply: gerryt_at_vcn.bc.ca: "Re: ultra 10 or ultra enterprise II?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|