Re: Ultra 40 memory performance
- From: "Dave (from the UK)" <see-my-signature@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:10:35 +0100
Michael Laajanen wrote:
Hi,
Dave (from the UK) wrote:
I got an email from someone tonight who had borrowed from Sun an Ultra 40 (two Opteron 280 dual core processors, 16GB of memory, Quadro FX 4500 gfx) with a view to buying some if suitable. They compared it against then HP xw9300 and whilst the CPU performance was about comparable between the machine, the memory performance of the Sun was quite poor.If that is true, one could connect that to your thread about PSU and RAM problems!
"What was strange, though, is that the xw9300 had an around 30-35% better memory performance than the Ultra 40. Our software engineers found the same effect also under Linux, so it's probably a problem with the hardware design. Since we have to return the machine we couldn't further investigate the reason, but Sun engineers confirmed that the memory performance is suboptimal on the U40."
Anyone else noticed this, or would dispute it? Anyone compared the Ultra 40 against a Tyan S2895 motherboard which I believe the HP uses?
It could then be that they have slowed down the RAM interface due to signal/power issues!
Except that power/RAM issue someone mentioned was I believe on the Ultra 20, not the Ultra 40. (I think it was on the tread about what did a U 40 motherboard look like, but that thread digressed one hell of a lot).
So a new PCB rev. should be in the works...
I'd hope so if the U 40 does have a problem.
/michael
--
Dave K MCSE.
MCSE = Minefield Consultant and Solitaire Expert.
Please note my email address changes periodically to avoid spam.
It is always of the form: month-year@domain. Hitting reply will work
for a couple of months only. Later set it manually.
.
- References:
- Ultra 40 memory performance
- From: Dave (from the UK)
- Re: Ultra 40 memory performance
- From: Michael Laajanen
- Ultra 40 memory performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Ultra 40 memory performance
- Next by Date: Re: Solaris OS versions supported on the cool thread series
- Previous by thread: Re: Ultra 40 memory performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|