Re: Help with ICEauthority file??!!?
From: Vwakes (vwakeNOSPAM100_at_softhome.net)
Date: 05/06/03
- Previous message: Jeffrey Silverman: "Re: Help with ICEauthority file??!!?"
- In reply to: Jeffrey Silverman: "Re: Help with ICEauthority file??!!?"
- Next in thread: Jeffrey Silverman: "Re: Help with ICEauthority file??!!?"
- Reply: Jeffrey Silverman: "Re: Help with ICEauthority file??!!?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 16:22:07 GMT
On Tue, 6 May 2003, Jeffrey Silverman wrote:
<snipped>
>>> I personally hate when Unix people (and I am a Unix people, people)
>>> say "man progname" in response to a person asking for help...
>>>
>> Well..i would have definetely explained If I had known for sure. If
>> you see, my response was basically in reply to your observation of
>> not able to find any useful information. I think thats how this NGs
>> function, if ppl know, they will definetely respond. Thats the
>> underlying spirit. But instead you are choosing urself to force on
>> others. Not sure, that will work. And besides, why should I take the
>> time to look out for the man pages(this is the first time I am seeing
>> it myself), type it in and post for you to see!
>
>You obviously missed my point entirely. I have checked the man pages,
>see?
No. I didnt. You never mentioned that you checked all the man pages. If
you cant find manpage useful, then I dont know what else can.
>My point is that man pages are not really the best place to go to learn
>about software that you are not familiar with.
You are not trying to learn a software here. You just find clues
/sidenotes/ references/ keywords (for google search) that help you to
work your way out. and defintely something USEFUL.
>They are much more for remembering command-line args, switches, and
>config file syntax. Jogging the memory, reference, whatever. But NOT a
>learning tool!
Nobody said it is. It has its functions and its performing it very well.
>And what do you mean by "But instead you are choosing urself to force
>on others."? I really don't understand;
You can just post your questions and ask for help. Your post 'appeared'
to 'extort' replies from readers by looking desperate and making
presumptuous judgements abt the readers. Well, if its really serious
enough ppl will understand. Like somedays back when a person had lost
his data on hd while formatting.
>I was simply asking th community if anyone knows anything useful about
>ICEauthority files.
Thats your freedom.
>I am having a recurring problem and I can't seem to find anyone who
>can help me fix it.
Obviously, you havent googled enuf, if you had then with 'man Xsecurity'
and with this following link, you could have figured everything out.
https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/message-bus-list/2003-February/000093.html
In fact, I was about to post all these info to you, but you never
verified that there isnt a NG by the name alt.linux and if you put such
ngs in a 'Follow-up To:' header, some newsreaders can never followup to
a post, I posted the article thrice, before figuring out what the
problem was and losing my patience/motivation in the process and so my
post ended up with just one line of mans. I usually dont post like that
unless the post warrants it. So its my fault and I am sorry for that.
>Sheesh.
Dont sheesh on ppl without finding where the problem lies.
-V (-:^:-)
-- Remove NOSPAM in the email to reply http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
- Previous message: Jeffrey Silverman: "Re: Help with ICEauthority file??!!?"
- In reply to: Jeffrey Silverman: "Re: Help with ICEauthority file??!!?"
- Next in thread: Jeffrey Silverman: "Re: Help with ICEauthority file??!!?"
- Reply: Jeffrey Silverman: "Re: Help with ICEauthority file??!!?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|