Re: Cross Platform Directory Access

From: Ian Wilson (scobloke2_at_infotop.co.uk)
Date: 08/23/03

  • Next message: qazmlp: "'automatic node restart'"
    Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 15:39:35 +0000 (UTC)
    
    

    Davide Bianchi wrote:
    > Hustler <cabrooks2000@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >
    >>Sometimes I am able to have read access but I want to be able to write
    >>to those partitions
    >
    >
    > You have to enable the write support by hand, and note that writing
    > on NTFS can easily destroy the whole partition. So, when it happen,
    > don't came here crying.

    Just to elaborate on that a bit, here's the way I understand it:

    Prior to Windows NT, DOS and Windows used variants of the FAT
    filesystem. This was well understood outside MS. It wasn't especially
    hard to write the code to read and write to FAT filesystems reliably.

    Linux systems can happily read and write to FAT filesystems.

     From Windows NT onwards (NT,2K,XP,...) MS introduced the NTFS
    filesystem which supports better security and numerous other desirable
    features. There have, however, been several successive versions of NTFS.
    These are all proprietary and without public documentation (i.e the
    inner details are kept secret by MS).

    The Open Source community have not yet worked out *all* the details of
    how various versions of NTFS work (and presumably how to cater for any
    bugs in all the versions of Windows that use it). For all I know there
    may well be patent issues that need to be carefully trodden around.

    Hence Linux support for writing to NTFS is incomplete. You can do it but
    Windows may perceive the filesystem as damaged.

    The best ways to share writeable data between Windows and Linux are
    probably
    a) FAT32 (dual-boot single PC) and
    b) SAMBA (if separate PCs).
    Maybe vmware helps with NTFS?

    --
    Ian Wilson.
    

  • Next message: qazmlp: "'automatic node restart'"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Windows and Maildir
      ... Windows NT with NTFS has both file streams and extended ... > NT whose performance with large directories is better than that of FAT. ... And there won't be much of a difference between FAT and NTFS. ... because the problem is in the filesystem format and not in the ...
      (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)
    • Re: [opensuse] Corrupted harddisk, recovery??
      ... I didn't think win98 supported NTFS ... Technology File System) drives present on your system become fully accessible as native Windows 98 volumes. ... When something occurs at the filesystem level, ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: FreeBSD Coexisting with Windows
      ... I have a Windows XP machine that has two NTFS ... > partitions on it already, and I'm thinking of installing FreeBSD on this ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • Re: Partition and File System
      ... > At present I have all partitions formatted with NTFS. ... > Windows Help says that earlier versions of windows (98, ... The partition I said that I> decided to format with FAT32 is used to keep backup files> and I don't have any other choice. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: Installation to dedicated disk
      ... Don't make all your windows partitions NTFS, ... Ubuntu doesn't normally write to NTFS partitions; ...
      (Ubuntu)