Re: File Descriptors

From: Doug Freyburger (dfreybur_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 08/18/04

  • Next message: Bruno Gallant: "version control of server scripts"
    Date: 18 Aug 2004 09:16:23 -0700
    
    

    Jim Bo wrote:
    >
    > Can anyone tell me if there are any risks associated with increasing
    > the number of file descriptors for an application/user process beyond
    > the default 1024?

    Enjoy debugging some application that opens that many files at once!

    I suspect the risks are organizational more than technical except
    for programs using expect() system calls. More resources for a
    rootkit to use if you get cracked, more interaction of two programs
    opening the same file without checking optional locks, etc.

    Many of the original limits come from a time when memory was much
    more expensive.


  • Next message: Bruno Gallant: "version control of server scripts"

    Relevant Pages

    • File Descriptors
      ... Can anyone tell me if there are any risks associated with increasing ... the number of file descriptors for an application/user process beyond ... I am running on Solaris 5.8. ...
      (comp.unix.admin)
    • Re: Why I Am On ACTOS 15Mg
      ... studies came out nobody knew how bad ... Jim, some doctors refuse to hand out rx's for new drugs until they have ... My niece is a pediatrician who is well aware of the risks of routinely ... "the drug companies will never stand for that." ...
      (alt.support.diabetes)
    • Re: Why I Am On ACTOS 15Mg
      ... studies came out nobody knew how bad ... Jim, some doctors refuse to hand out rx's for new drugs until they have a longer safety track record. ... Unfortunately, now that drug companies run continuing medical education and own all the consensus guidelines that insurers haven't bought, doctors are penalized for not writing them and fewer will take the financial risks of being that independent. ...
      (alt.support.diabetes)
    • Re: [ADMIN] Time for rec.guns airing out
      ... I don't think anything needs to change at all, Jim. ... The only forum I can think ... of that's as well run is RISKS (which, interestingly, is almost exactly the same ... -- John W. Pierce ...
      (rec.guns)
    • Re: FYI: Missing word in EDICT.
      ... and Jim probably would if they were handed ... I do worry that 'standard Edict' risks getting ...
      (sci.lang.japan)