Re: Number of Admin's per Server
From: Mxsmanic (mxsmanic_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/05/05
- Previous message: V Crenshaw: "Number of Admin's per Server"
- In reply to: V Crenshaw: "Number of Admin's per Server"
- Next in thread: V Crenshaw: "Re: Number of Admin's per Server"
- Reply: V Crenshaw: "Re: Number of Admin's per Server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 23:09:22 +0100
V Crenshaw writes:
> Have you seen in any of the industry mags with a survery or article that
> talks about the
> optimum number of unix or AIX admins per server?
Unless the workload is very heavy, a single administrator should be
optimal. For mission-critical machines, two people with root access
would probably be wise (although only one might normally carry out all
the administration duties).
For large systems and in cases where responsibility must be divided for
security reasons, you might want several administrators with different
duties. The UNIX architecture doesn't lend itself to this, though,
since you're either root or you're not, so it's all or nothing as
privileges go. There are some creative workarounds, but they involve
allowing ordinary users to run a few privileged programs; the only real
administrators are those with the root password, and anyone with the
root password can do anything.
One of the problems I've always had with UNIX is this all-or-nothing
sysadmin privilege, but it's a problem shared by a great many operating
systems.
-- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
- Previous message: V Crenshaw: "Number of Admin's per Server"
- In reply to: V Crenshaw: "Number of Admin's per Server"
- Next in thread: V Crenshaw: "Re: Number of Admin's per Server"
- Reply: V Crenshaw: "Re: Number of Admin's per Server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|