Re: WHat is more secure by default?

From: "as400" <vin42and99@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 24 Mar 2006 11:59:50 -0800

For example:

Solaris has MORE services to be loaded by default than FreeBSD
would...FreeBSD has NO NFS, Telnet, loaded by default....Solaris has
these services loaded by default...

I am asking in terms of a DEFAULT INSTALLTION....Which would be more
secure? FreeBSD or Solaris???

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
  - From: Casper H . S . ***
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
  - From: as400
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
  - From: as400

References:
- WHat is more secure by default?
  - From: as400
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
  - From: Dave Hinz
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
  - From: as400
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
  - From: Dave Hinz
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
  - From: as400
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
  - From: Tim Skirvin

Prev by Date: Re: WHat is more secure by default?
Next by Date: Re: WHat is more secure by default?
Previous by thread: Re: WHat is more secure by default?
Next by thread: Re: WHat is more secure by default?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread