Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: "Doug Freyburger" <dfreybur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Mar 2006 08:19:22 -0800
as400 wrote:
What more info do you want from me?
Now we're getting somewhere. Context is needed. No one
in their right mind rolls an OS off the CDROM, sets the root
password and walks away. So the "by default" stance is
irrelevant. What is relevant is your situation and what you
are trying to accomplish. Hypotheticals that really are
hypotheticals are pointless. Hypotheticals that are really
your situation with the hostnames and IP numbers changed,
those are practical examples.
.
- References:
- WHat is more secure by default?
- From: as400
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: Dave Hinz
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: as400
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: Dave Hinz
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: as400
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: Tim Skirvin
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: as400
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: as400
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: Tim Skirvin
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: as400
- WHat is more secure by default?
- Prev by Date: Re: kernel options
- Next by Date: Re: (Semi-OT) CS refresher for a Unix sysadmin
- Previous by thread: Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- Next by thread: Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- Index(es):