Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: "Jay C. James" <x0040973@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:47:36 -0800
"as400" <vin42and99@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143227928.239307.174390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Are douing this on purpose to piss me off???
I SAID....I JUST WANT TO CONMPARE BETWEEN TO TWO.......
IN GENERAL...WHICH ONE IS MORE SECURE????
ITs not about me installing it...I just want to know between the two
OSs UNCONFIGURED BY DEFAULT would be more secure. FreeBSD or
Solaris...THIS A OVERALL GENEAL QUESTION....
Its like asking which is more secure Windows or Linux...Well of
course...LINUX would be more secure...BUT LINUX HAS SECURITY HOLES
TOO..But not as much as Windows...
Im tring to ask the same between FtreebSD and Solaris...
Whats so hard to understand....?????
IF I was to...BUT IM NOT GOING TO....Install FreeBSD or Solaris WITHOUT
configuring it in a test lab enviroment...Which one will be more prone
to security vulnerabilties????
What ARE thinking???? That IM going to install these without
configuring it on a server?? THINK FOR A MOMENT...WIll you??
I am pertainting to a TEST ENVIROMENT...
If I were to install the default settings out of the box which of the
two would be more secure in a test lab enviroment?
When you type in all caps, it slows the internet down ;)
jcj
.
- References:
- WHat is more secure by default?
- From: as400
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: Dave Hinz
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: as400
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: Dave Hinz
- Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- From: as400
- WHat is more secure by default?
- Prev by Date: Re: (Semi-OT) CS refresher for a Unix sysadmin
- Next by Date: Re: Is Windows with Cygwin Unix?
- Previous by thread: Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- Next by thread: Re: WHat is more secure by default?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|