Re: Slow rlogin after upgrade to 5.2.

From: Hemant Shah (shah_at_typhoon.xnet.com)
Date: 08/21/03


Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:44:31 +0000 (UTC)

While stranded on information super highway F. Michael Orr wrote:
:)"Richard D. Latham" <lathamr@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
:)news:n0e3ennj.fsf@us.ibm.com...
:)> Hemant Shah <shah@typhoon.xnet.com> writes:
:)>
:)> > While stranded on information super highway Jason Mather wrote:
:)> > :)Hemant Shah wrote:
:)> > :)> Folks,
:)> > :)>
:)> > :)> Recently we upgraded our H70 from AIX 4.3.3 to AIX 5.2. After the
:)updrade
:)> > :)> rlogin, remsh, rcp commands take almost 15 seconds to make the
:)> > :)> connection. Once the connection is made everything works O.K.
:)> > :)> In AIX 4.3.3 it was instantaneous.
:)> > :)>
:)> > :)> Did anything change between AIX 4.3.3 and AIX 5.2?
:)> > :)>
:)> > :)>
:)> > :)> Thanks.
:)> > :)>
:)> > :)>
:)> > :)>
:)> > :)
:)> > :)Sounds like a name resolution problem.
:)> > :)If you include the domain name is it fast?
:)> >
:)> > No, it is still slow. I changed the /etc/netsvc.conf file and specified
:)> > "local4,bind4" instead of "local,bind" so that it does not do IPV6
:)resolution.
:)> >
:)> > I also changed inetd.conf file and start rlogind with -c option, but it
:)is
:)> > still slow. It seems that only the 'r' commands (rlogin, etc) are slow.
:)> > telnet, ftp and other applications have no problem.
:)> >
:)> > This is only a problem for an outbound rlogin, etc comamnds from a
:)> > AIX 5.2.0.0 (according to oslevel) system. We have other systems at AIX
:)> > 4.3.3, AIX 5.1.0.0, Linux, Sun Solaris 8, and HP-UX 11, they do not
:)have
:)> > any problem. rlogin from other system to the AIX 5.2.0.0 system is
:)> > instantaneous also.
:)>
:)> <snip>
:)>
:)> It's likely that the reverse address resolution on the _target_
:)> machine is amuck.
:)>
:)> Have you checked the DNS server list (probably in /etc/resolv.conf) on
:)> the remote command target host ?
:)>
:)> As far as that goes, an nslookup "over there" of your AIX box's DNS
:)> name might be instructive.
:)>
:)> --
:)> #include <disclaimer.std> /* I don't speak for IBM ... */
:)> /* Heck, I don't even speak for myself */
:)> /* Don't believe me ? Ask my wife :-) */
:)> Richard D. Latham lathamr@us.ibm.com
:)
:)We had a similar problem when I upgraded to 5.2L, and I bet you from your
:)posts its on the hosts defined locally. The file that now defines
:)resolution order is /etc/irs.conf. If, for example, you only do local hosts
:)and DNS (no NIS), set the irs.conf as follows:

  We do not have /etc/irs.conf file. Should I create it?
  What does it do, is there any documentation on it?

  Thanks.

:)
:)hosts local continue
:)hosts dns
:)
:)That will do local /etc/hosts lookups first, then DNS. This may resolve
:)your problem.
:)
:)

-- 
Hemant Shah                           /"\  ASCII ribbon campaign
E-mail: NoJunkMailshah@xnet.com       \ /  --------------------- 
                                       X     against HTML mail
TO REPLY, REMOVE NoJunkMail           / \      and postings      
FROM MY E-MAIL ADDRESS.           
-----------------[DO NOT SEND UNSOLICITED BULK E-MAIL]------------------
I haven't lost my mind,                Above opinions are mine only.
it's backed up on tape somewhere.      Others can have their own.


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Stopping all invalid domains from resolving to server IP
    ... > before DNS. ... Could you try the nisplus from the hosts entry in your ... > you will have to look there for your odd name resolution issues. ... I do not need NIS+, ...
    (linux.redhat)
  • Re: How is DNS resolution working?
    ... >> I know that we don't have anything in the hosts or lmhosts files on ... >> the settings for the DNS in network properties. ... > machine A to point to a WINS server for NetBIOS name resolution to be ... > lmhosts files, and I'm pretty sure that we didn't configure any IP ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.dns)
  • Re: How is DNS resolution working?
    ... >> I know that we don't have anything in the hosts or lmhosts files on ... >> the settings for the DNS in network properties. ... > machine A to point to a WINS server for NetBIOS name resolution to be ... > lmhosts files, and I'm pretty sure that we didn't configure any IP ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)
  • Re: DNS server and hosts file???
    ... It is a bad news that DNS did not use hosts ... file for name resolution. ... I use ISA server for network protection. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.dns)
  • Re: Beating the spam filter ...
    ... A name that is not a machine's internal identity is more easily moved to refer to another machine, and that capability seems to be driving a lot of the interesting novelty in IT these days. ... You use names to refer to services where as I use names to refer to hosts and then use CNAMEs to refer service names to hosts. ... I think using the RFC-I lists for spam control is properly career-limiting for a mail admin, but people do use them, and the "bogus MX" list is probably the least problematic. ... That name carries a complex meaning to me and about a dozen other people, and it is in DNS from the viewpoint of tens of thousands of other machines. ...
    (comp.mail.sendmail)