Re: backupbyname very slow
From: Hajo Ehlers (service_at_metamodul.com)
Date: 09/16/05
- Next message: Hajo Ehlers: "Re: NIM install bundles: RPMs are processed last??"
- Previous message: rapyle_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Crazy error codes"
- In reply to: rancid moth: "backupbyname very slow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 16 Sep 2005 06:41:11 -0700
Hi Moth,
i think your problem might be the large amount of small files.
To check this you should create a large file or many large file ( 20*1
GB ) and backup them up. Check the time the backup needed or test with
time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rmt0 ibs=1m obs=32k count=1000
If the backup speed is ok the bottleneck should not be the HBA or
Tapedrive or Tape.
BTW: ( Tapes can be bad - Check for write errors )
The point is to get a steady stream of data to the tape drive. If this
will not happen the speed will go down dramaticly.
Solutions:
1)
try to use 'dd' after backup with a large blocksize and conv=sync
( find .. | backup ... | dd of=/dev/rmt0 obs=256k conv=sync )
2)
Pack the small files to larger ones and backup these files. ( If you
must repeat these step do not forget to use after the first one a
nonrewind tape device )
3) Do a test restore.
hth
Hajo
The following Redbook is a section about
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/pdfs/sg246502.pdf
- Next message: Hajo Ehlers: "Re: NIM install bundles: RPMs are processed last??"
- Previous message: rapyle_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Crazy error codes"
- In reply to: rancid moth: "backupbyname very slow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|