AIX LUN Size
From: apples (mar35ca_at_gmail.com)
Date: 10/18/05
- Next message: Simon Marchese: "Re: Disk HeartBeat ...Issue"
- Previous message: Andreas Beckmann: "Re: add space to SAN - AIX disk size change?"
- Next in thread: vlad.zam_at_gmail.com: "Re: AIX LUN Size"
- Reply: vlad.zam_at_gmail.com: "Re: AIX LUN Size"
- Reply: Nathan: "Re: AIX LUN Size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 17 Oct 2005 17:07:53 -0700
Sorry for posting this here but I never got any feedback in the storage
group....
I have enterprise class storage (ESS800) and some lower-end fastt900
storage connected to AIX and Windows hosts.
Is there any benefit in creating smaller LUN's vs bigger LUN's when
connecting an AIX server to the ESS (or FAStT).
I was always lead to believe that the more hdisks the better since you
get more spindles and disk queues. If I create 5 LUN's or 10 LUN's from
the SAN storage then in both cases I may use the same number of
physical disks. So I'm not getting in more physical disks or spindles.
What about disk queues - I'm getting more of them when I create smaller
LUN's but I'm not really sure what (if anything) that is doing for my
performance.
Can someone explain the connection between LUN disk queues and phsical
disks - what do they really mean?
- Next message: Simon Marchese: "Re: Disk HeartBeat ...Issue"
- Previous message: Andreas Beckmann: "Re: add space to SAN - AIX disk size change?"
- Next in thread: vlad.zam_at_gmail.com: "Re: AIX LUN Size"
- Reply: vlad.zam_at_gmail.com: "Re: AIX LUN Size"
- Reply: Nathan: "Re: AIX LUN Size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|