Re: Permanent static route in AIX 4.3
- From: Jose Pina Coelho <eresquigal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Feb 2006 16:18:16 GMT
"Steve Greatbanks" <steve_greatbanks@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:ds1mc7$30n8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pseries/v5r3/index.jsp?topic=/It is supported, but it is a system file that can be overwritten by a PTF,
com.ibm.aix.doc/files/aixfiles/rc.net.htm Unsupported? Really?
whereas changes to the inet0 ODM object tend to be kept. If a PTF zaps all
your changes to /etc/rc.net, IBM support will say: "Your problem. Use
inet0 or your own init file".
If you want to add your routes to a file instead of the ODM, just add your
own inittab entry, say /etc/rc.local .
And in the doco above, "traditional configuration method" could easilyThe problem with the theory of the "portable configuration method" is that
be replaced
by "portable configuration method" :)
it clashes with system files. The ODM is a way of keeping data separated
from code(the scripts), so that you can update the code without having to
identify user changes and port them into the new scripts.
Heck, even linux is separating code from data.
One of the dangers with /etc/rc.net modifications is that IBM
reserves the right to overwrite or alter it during patching or OS
upgrades. They will leave ODM values alone, such as the chdev -l
inet0 approach.
This is a tricky area. I don't have insider information about what IBM
intends to deprecate and what will or won't be supported. My guess is
that rc.net is reasonably safe.
rc.net is safe, it's been there for over 15 years (and with minor
modifications along the way).
It's also not safe, since sometimes it gets trampled during version/release
migrations.
I'm sceptical that IBM would describe rc.net and the route command asIt's supported but unsafe.
"unsupported".
--
Doing AIX support was the most monty-pythonesque
activity available at the time.
Eagerly awaiting my thin chocolat mint.
.
- References:
- Permanent static route in AIX 4.3
- From: PN
- Re: Permanent static route in AIX 4.3
- From: Steve Greatbanks
- Re: Permanent static route in AIX 4.3
- From: Dan Foster
- Re: Permanent static route in AIX 4.3
- From: Steve Greatbanks
- Re: Permanent static route in AIX 4.3
- From: Dan Foster
- Re: Permanent static route in AIX 4.3
- From: Steve Greatbanks
- Permanent static route in AIX 4.3
- Prev by Date: serial console on a 7043
- Next by Date: Re: CDE/Network problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Permanent static route in AIX 4.3
- Next by thread: Re: Permanent static route in AIX 4.3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading