Re: SMT on IBM Power5+
- From: Andreas Beckmann <beckmaan@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:21:16 +0200
try to search here for "smt":
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/Web/Techdocs
There is no special document for POWER5+. But I don't think there is a
difference to POWER5 with SMT.
Cheers,
Andy
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:05:11 -0500, "Michael E. Thomadakis"
<miket@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On 2007-04-04, Michael E. Thomadakis <miket@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
More specifically, I would expect that SMT ON would benefit workload
mixes with high thread concurrency but with low contention on common
thread resources (L1/L2/L3 and functional units). For instance, I would
expect a cluster with a large number of distributed (and multithreaded)
processes running to benefit from SMT ON: twice as many h/w threads can
be active at a time, obviating the need for costly thread-switch.
I did some benchmarking on a P5+ cluster last fall, and was
quite surprised that SMT=ON (and 1 task per virtuall cpu vs.
1 task per physical cpu in SMT=OFF) was giving best performance
on all the benchmarks we did. Even for 16 node (~250 task)
mpi-jobs.
-jf
Jan thanks for your reply. We have a 40 node p5-575 cluster with 32GB
DRAM/node. Nodes are attached to 2 planes of HPS. I was contending that
SMT ON should benefit the cluster since all of the cluster control
processes (RSCT, GPFS, HPS assistance, etc.) are heavily multi-threaded
and by not being compute-intensive, they should benefit from SMT ON.
Are there any public benchmarks that I can run to demonstrate the
benefits of SMT ?
thanks again,
Michael
--
Andreas Beckmann
Andreas.Beckmann@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.muenster.de/~andy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SMT on IBM Power5+
- From: Michael E. Thomadakis
- Re: SMT on IBM Power5+
- Prev by Date: Re: xlC version 8 file inclusion errors when using -I option
- Next by Date: Performance issue during backups
- Previous by thread: Re: Can VIOS be updated using SMIT?
- Next by thread: Re: SMT on IBM Power5+
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading