Re: Sending mails in a jail
From: Simon J (nomail_at_please)
Date: 09/18/03
- Next message: Bill Vermillion: "Re: remote upgrade from 3.x -> 4.x?"
- Previous message: Dave Shawley: "Fetchmail, procmail, and IMAP?"
- In reply to: synuw: "Re: Sending mails in a jail"
- Next in thread: Syn: "Re: Sending mails in a jail"
- Reply: Syn: "Re: Sending mails in a jail"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 18 Sep 2003 03:23:36 GMT
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 19:03:27 GMT, synuw hunched over the keyboard,
flexed their fingers and thumped:
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
>> As you've already been advised, you want to set the variable to
>> "NO" in the jail. If you set it to "YES", as you say you've
>> done, then, indeed, it will listen for incoming connections.
>
> Oups sorry I mistyped myself: I have setted sendmain_enable="NO"
> in the jail environement and still there is a listener on the
> jail's IP address on port 25. Where could the problem be ?
>
> Regards
>
>
>
There is no problem. Setting sendmail_enable="NO" would normally cause
the listener to bind to the loopback address. There is no loopback
address in a jail, therefore it must bind to the jails IP
-- Simon __________________________________________ 037°49'00" S 144°58'00" E GMT +10:00
- Next message: Bill Vermillion: "Re: remote upgrade from 3.x -> 4.x?"
- Previous message: Dave Shawley: "Fetchmail, procmail, and IMAP?"
- In reply to: synuw: "Re: Sending mails in a jail"
- Next in thread: Syn: "Re: Sending mails in a jail"
- Reply: Syn: "Re: Sending mails in a jail"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|