Re: Poor performance ipf in combination p2p software!

From: Sno__ (Dont_at_mail.me)
Date: 09/30/03


Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:01:58 +0200


> You realise that BitTorrent download bandwidth depends on how much
> upload bandwidth you are offering, right? If you limit download you
> will not get good upload performance.
>

Yes i do, but blame my IPF box for our problems :( Listen:
Some1 we know (whit the same provider) can DL 2 or 3 movies over night,
while my bro's waiting days for a DL to finish. The only diff in
configuration is that we share our Inet connect while our friend is directly
connected his cable to his pc whit no firewall software of a kind. He don't
care for security he says, well that's his problem.... but mine is now
getting a good configuration into my ipf box that will work.
btw i changed the keep state --> keep state flags S, now it seems the
session state list is not forming real problems anymore, id like to enlarge
it as well but dont know how to do so, yet.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Poor performance ipf in combination p2p software!
    ... > upload bandwidth, whereas he is not. ... But the configuration are the same he limits up to ... problem i se is the ipf box as a possible flaw as that is the only diff. ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
  • ipf over bridge strange problem.
    ... You'ld find others configuration details at the end of this post. ... ipf starts to reject incomming connexions that should be ok. ... pci0: <PCI bus> on pcib0 ... on ppbus0 ...
    (freebsd-net)
  • Re: Poor performance ipf in combination p2p software!
    ... >> You realise that BitTorrent download bandwidth depends on how much ... >> upload bandwidth you are offering, ... If you limit download you ... > getting a good configuration into my ipf box that will work. ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)