Re: Newbie looking for a UNIX
From: boffy_b (boffy_at_boffy.tk)
Date: 11/15/03
- Next message: David Bolton: "Re: Newbie Question: versions ?"
- Previous message: Simon Barner: "Re: Newbie looking for a UNIX"
- In reply to: Simon Barner: "Re: Newbie looking for a UNIX"
- Next in thread: Simon Barner: "Re: Newbie looking for a UNIX"
- Reply: Simon Barner: "Re: Newbie looking for a UNIX"
- Reply: John Eggert: "Re: Newbie looking for a UNIX"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 18:42:44 +0000
OK, thanks for th advice. Pseudo-code is always funny, lol. I just
re-read my post, and I commend you for not slapping me about th face
with a wet badger.
BTW - Is it customary on usenet to reply below th original message? I am
used to e-mail, and replying above th original.
Thankee
boffy_b
Simon Barner wrote:
>>I started out this with th
>>intention of asking people to recommend a free(has to be all free
>>software, none of your RedHat here) UNIX which can run most free UNIX
>>software(read: all free software which runs on gnu/linux, I believe
>>NetBSD is quite good at that?).
>
>
> The standard answer to this question is: Have a try and decide on your
> own. If you ask for recommendations in an excessive X-post, they will
> usually look like this:
>
> Since you are asking in the $OS group, we recommend $OS to you, since
> it has the following advantages:
>
> #include <advantages_$OS.h>
>
> Simon
--
\//_
C ._)
| _| - "It is amazing what you can
| | accomplish if you do not
care who gets the credit." - Anon
- Next message: David Bolton: "Re: Newbie Question: versions ?"
- Previous message: Simon Barner: "Re: Newbie looking for a UNIX"
- In reply to: Simon Barner: "Re: Newbie looking for a UNIX"
- Next in thread: Simon Barner: "Re: Newbie looking for a UNIX"
- Reply: Simon Barner: "Re: Newbie looking for a UNIX"
- Reply: John Eggert: "Re: Newbie looking for a UNIX"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
